i'm comparing pairs of column data wilcoxon rank sum test , getting exact same pvalue majority of comparisons. wondering if judging data whether made mistake or alright. here of comparisons.
this comparison used
wtresult<-wilcox.test(datachunk[,i],datachunk[,(i+1)],paired=false) and here results data used above it.
x1 x2 x3 339.53 354.11 435.56 425.34 434.64 436.08 x1 x2 x3 312.1 282.2 281.6 na na na wilcoxon rank sum test data: datachunk[, i] , datachunk[, (i + 1)] w = 18, p-value = 0.02381 alternative hypothesis: true location shift not equal 0 x1 x2 x3 161.21 150.01 183.47 201.51 234.70 321.00 x1 x2 x3 501.0 520.1 500.7 na na na wilcoxon rank sum test data: datachunk[, i] , datachunk[, (i + 1)] w = 0, p-value = 0.02381 alternative hypothesis: true location shift not equal 0 x1 x2 x3 247.79 159.64 192.00 262.86 403.33 336.21 x1 x2 x3 60.33 66.04 55.23 na na na wilcoxon rank sum test data: datachunk[, i] , datachunk[, (i + 1)] w = 18, p-value = 0.02381 alternative hypothesis: true location shift not equal 0 x1 x2 x3 17.12 15.83 16.88 17.61 18.97 45.92 x1 x2 x3 321.8 329.7 334.4 na na na
the test little "chunky" small numbers of observations if have boundary case (all of first argument values larger second argument values or vise versa) identical p-values , w statistics 0 or other number (depending on n).
for more detailed answer we'd need see data or need agree @ other data can see.
here's example of code shows behavior i'm talking about
i <- 1 datachunk <- mtcars[1:5,] wilcox.test(datachunk[,i],datachunk[,(i+1)],paired=false) <- 2 wilcox.test(datachunk[,i],datachunk[,(i+1)],paired=false)
Comments
Post a Comment